Welcome to My Awesome GeoCities-Inspired Blog!

Prem Patel's Blog!

Sharing my thoughts on engineering and other cool stuff.

Useful Information For Engineering Students @ USYD

June 09, 2025

This is a drive of useful resources for engineering students (specifically civil, but other streams will also find this helpful) at the University of Sydney.

This drive was originally compiled for the ENGO mentoring program. It was shared to me by Jonathan Lee, so all credit goes to him. However, I will continue to update the folder as more resources come out.

Included in the folder:

  • Information about PEP (Professional Engagement Program) and using SONIA
  • Useful info on internships, LinkedIn, employability and writings CVs
  • Past presentations for ENGG2112 (Multidisciplinary Engineering)
  • Info on final year thesis programs (civil engineering)

Here is the folder link: ENGG Mentoring Resources

Note: you must be logged into your USYD account (@uni.sydney.edu.au) to access the OneDrive. The reason for this is some of the material belongs to USYD and thus cannot be shared with entities outside of the organisation.

PS: If you have any resources that you think would be helpful to new students/current students and that should be in the folder, feel free to send me an email and I'll add them in.

By Prem Patel at June 09, 2025

No comments:

Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Tags: USYD students

Winning A Bridge Building Competition

April 17, 2025

So the University of Sydney held a bridge building competition for mainly 1st year undergraduate students. Here's how we won.

Firstly, the aim of the competition was to create the longest bridge that could support the weight of a stack of tape. Hence, this was NOT a strength-based bridge competition. This was basically why we won. Many other groups made bridges that were structurally sound (relatively), but were simply not at long as ours.

My team's approach was to use tape as the bridge. We came to this conclusion based on the materials we were provided. We were given paddle-pop sticks, sticky tape, blu tack, a few thick rubber bands, and 2 Styrofoam balls. Obviously, this means any of the traditional bridges one would build for a competition like this were not feasible. The lack of notching meant that the joints of a Howe or Pratt truss, for example, would simply be too weak. Plus, given this was a length-based competition, a Pratt or Howe truss would take far too many paddle-pop sticks to create a bridge of length.

So this tape bridge was first tested by simply taping between two tables. 2 parallel lengths of tape were used, with a paddle-pop stick platform in the middle to hold the 2 pieces of tape adjacent and for the stack of tape used as weights to sit on.

However, we could not stick the ends of the tape bridge to the actual table (ie. the bridge had to be freely movable). But we did know that to test the bridge, both ends would be placed on a small table. Hence, we could use an 'anchor' to hold the bridge from the opposite end of the table:

The orange circles represent anchors made from paddle-pop sticks sticking out of the 2 styrofoam balls. This was further secured using the thick rubber bands

And so there was a fair amount of tension in the bridge, but it was not physically glued/stuck onto any surface. This was the winning build.

By Prem Patel at April 17, 2025

No comments:

Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Tags: Personal

Artificial Intelligence & Civil Engineering

March 10, 2025

Will AI take over the civil engineering industry in the next 50 years? No. It will not.

Well, it depends what is meant by "take over". Will civil engineers have their jobs replaced by AI? No. Will civil engineers begin to use AI in their daily workflow? Most definitely, yes. Many have probably started using AI to run rudimentary calculations already. But this idea of using AI as a "tool" will become prevalent on every industry on planet earth; from medicine to politics.

However, when it comes to replacing the jobs of actual civil engineers, AI (as we know it) is a long, long way away. Here's why:

  1. Physical Labour
    Civil engineering is a blend between white and blue collar work. Site engineers spend most of their time getting their hands dirty and working on a construction site, with some office work thrown in. On the other hand, design engineers spend most of their time in an office, but still have to perform site inspections. Either way, both involve physical activity that currently AI models simply cannot perform due to a lack of hardware compatibility. And this is only structural engineering! Geotechnical and transport engineering require far more physical testing and inspection.
  2. Licensure
    AI most certainly won't be stamping drawing and signing documents. A civil engineer's job is important, really important, as a single calculation fault puts thousands of lives at risk. But AI is a machine, and all machines malfunction or do not function in a specific task at all. Ultimately, each process needs to end with a real civil engineer checking documents and calculations for the sake of safety and redundancy.
  3. Management
    Civil engineering is not simply a calculations-based role. A lot of the job involves collaboration with contractors, architects, laborer's and other engineers. Plus, many civil engineers move towards construction management roles as this is the natural progression of the career. Even if AI does automate all the calculations-based jobs of a civil engineer, it simply cannot manage groups of people or meet with clients.

If I were the guess which professions are genuinely at risk from AI in the next 50 years, I would guess lawyers, software developers, and analysts. Engineers, and especially civil engineers (the most physical of the engineering disciplines) are a long way away from being replaced by AI.

So sleep well tonight :)

By Prem Patel at March 10, 2025

No comments:

Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Tags: Digital Technology

The Fool Proof Note-Taking System (for students & others)

March 03, 2025

In honour of finally starting my civil engineering degree, I am writing a post on what I believe is the best way to study and note-take as a student. Although this is focused around university, this principles in this system can be applied to real work.

Firstly, this is a no-nonsense system. You will not see any fancy note-taking apps, no fancy note taking strategies or elaborate systems of revision. This entire system is made up of the basics which work. This system is an amalgamation of what has worked for me and what I have seen work for other, very academically successful students.

  1. Lectures & Tutorials
    In lectures/tutorials, notes are taken by hand-writing. This forces you to filter out unnecessary words. Also, this encourages you to actually listen to your tutor/lecturer, and not just copy down what they have written on slides word-for-word (most if not all class powerpoints and notes are posted online anyways). These notes can be written on a tablet or traditional pen and paper.
  2. Now, notes should be written in abbreviations. Replace 'addition' with 'add'. Replace 'and' with '+'. Replace 'because' with 'bc'. This way you have time to write down the more important information, like technical jargon and equations.

    Furthermore, use a different colour pen/highlighter to note topics you don't fully understand. For example, if a new term is used, highlight it. Later, review these highlights, and deepen your knowledge by either asking your teacher for clarification or using the internet/online resources. It is crucial this step is completed before the next step below.

    The only scenario where hand-written notes are not possible is during programming classes. In this case, notes can be taken via comments in the script.

  3. Compiling Notes
    Notes should be compiled in a single place. This is simply the most convenient and efficient way to do things. There exist plenty of note-taking apps out there, but the best by far are Obsidian and Onenote.

    Obsidian is the single best markdown text editor that is available completely for free, and obsidian sync can either be paid for or set up for free using a service like Syncthing. For those who study subject that rely on markdown for note-taking, like programming or computer science, this is the best option. For less tech-intensive studies, Onenote is the best. It has almost unlimited features, supports handwritten writing, includes syncing, is available for free with student signups and is created and maintained by a reputable and respectable company.

    These notes should be typed up based on your lecture and tutorial notes. This also ensures you are revising every lecture/tutorial frequently. I usually do this at home after a day of classes.

    Notes should be compiled periodically after lessons, and once the lesson content is fully understood. This compiled notebook serves as a neat display of the main course information and is our main source for exam revision. Note, since this notebook is being used for exam revision, it should ONLY contain the KEY content of the course and should be as minimalist as possible. Practice problems should be done elsewhere. This allows the course content to be reviewed anytime and anywhere; whether your on public transport, eating, or on the toilet.

    Finally, make sure to make use of diagrams, tables, equations and code blocks. All of these are features available in Onenote, and flowcharts can be drawn using the built-in drawing feature. This reduces text clutter and organizes information based on subtopics better.

That is it! You now have personalized notes for all your courses in a single place, ready for revision!

By Prem Patel at March 03, 2025

No comments:

Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Tags: USYD students

Follow Your Passion: a horrible piece of advice

February 04, 2025

I believe being told to follow your passion is truly horrible advice.

This occurred to me, surprisingly, in a weightlifting context. In weightlifting, and probably every other sport in the world, there are many people who are "passionate" about training. However, they simply do not have the genetic potential or circumstance to actually become international level competitors who can make a living from Olympic weightlifting/playing their sport. As a result, they spend their foundational years training and end up with no qualifications/real work experience, meaning they have to work relatively low paying jobs with no career progression.

This brings me to the fundamental problem of "following your passion". You cannot tell someone to follow their "passion" if you don't know what they're passionate about! Unfortunately, there is a LOT of young people passionate about sport, yet only a very, VERY select few of them will ever make a living playing sport. Similarly, following your passion for gender studies or personal training simply isn't going to make you happy in the long run. Trust me, personal training sounds nice until you have to work with horrible managers and gyms whilst barely being paid 40k a year.

Think of it this way. People only like things they are good at. But to be good at something, you have to start of by being bad at it:

You do something you hate -> you get good at it -> then you begin to enjoy it

Furthermore, when people follow their passion, they miss out on opportunities they didn't even know existed. For example, in Australia, there are plenty of high paying jobs in mining engineering, the skilled trades, or in healthcare, that people don't even know exist because they haven't put in the right research (and some of these qualifications are relatively easy to get).

Hence, my final point. Don't follow your passion, follow opportunity.

- Prem

By Prem Patel at February 04, 2025

No comments:

Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Tags: Personal

Older Posts

Under Construction New! Generate your own 90s page here! Under Construction